click here to read more about the fuss and here for pop life showing @ tate modern
Follow HFA
Contact HFA
Editors
Search HFA blog
Categories
- And the Winner Is...
- Architecture
- Art A-GoGo
- Art versus Money
- Backstage
- Cinema
- Design
- Digital
- Elastic Minds
- Fashion
- Introducing
- Meanwhile
- Music
- Must-Have
- Must-Hear
- Must-Read
- Must-See
- Must-Visit
- Old School
- Pass the Sickbag
- Photography
- Random
- RIP
- Shameless Self-Promotion
- Showtime
- Snapshots
- Street Art
- Think-Porn
- Top Ten
- Travel
- Uncategorized
- WTF?
Blogroll
- According 2 G
- Adbusters
- Alltop Arts
- Animal New York
- Arrested Motion
- Art Fag City
- Art in America
- Art Observed
- Artforum
- Artinfo
- Artslant
- Bad at Sports
- Boing Boing
- Booooooom
- Brain Pickings
- Can You Dig It Too
- Cool Hunting
- Curbs and Stoops
- Designboom
- Fecal Face
- Hooked Blog
- Hyperallergic
- It's Nice That
- Juxtapoz
1 Comment
October 24 2009
Neocons? The Tate is walking in lockstep with the censors, which deserves a
bit more bile than that. (Remember David Wojnarowicz calling St. Patrick's
Cathedral "the house of walking swastikas"?) And the Tate has done it again,
by removing 34 images by artist Graham Ovenden, whose trial this week
ended abruptly, with the jury discharged, after some bit of prosecutorial
mischief was disclosed. Proof of the Tate's censorship or Mr. Ovenden's work
is here: http://notthetate.blogspot.com/
Neocons? How about neonazis?