Posted by Happy Famous Artists, 1 October 2009
click here to read more about the fuss and here for pop life showing @ tate modern
Neocons? The Tate is walking in lockstep with the censors, which deserves a
bit more bile than that. (Remember David Wojnarowicz calling St. Patrick's
Cathedral "the house of walking swastikas"?) And the Tate has done it again,
by removing 34 images by artist Graham Ovenden, whose trial this week
ended abruptly, with the jury discharged, after some bit of prosecutorial
mischief was disclosed. Proof of the Tate's censorship or Mr. Ovenden's work
is here: http://notthetate.blogspot.com/
Neocons? How about neonazis?
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Name *
Email *
Website
Comment
1 Comment
October 24 2009
Neocons? The Tate is walking in lockstep with the censors, which deserves a
bit more bile than that. (Remember David Wojnarowicz calling St. Patrick's
Cathedral "the house of walking swastikas"?) And the Tate has done it again,
by removing 34 images by artist Graham Ovenden, whose trial this week
ended abruptly, with the jury discharged, after some bit of prosecutorial
mischief was disclosed. Proof of the Tate's censorship or Mr. Ovenden's work
is here: http://notthetate.blogspot.com/
Neocons? How about neonazis?